Identification of challenges and solutions for smartphone mobile ap-plication development using quality function deployment (QFD):The case of Iranecosystem
The growing prevalence of smartphones has led to the emergence of numerous individuals and small companies venturing into the realm of mobile application development (MAD). The MAD ecosystems are highly dynamic, facing constant challenges stemming from financial, social, cultural, and economic factors. Addressing and resolving these challenges is of paramount importance, particularly when considering the involvement of innovative, diverse, and youthful talents in application development.This paper introduces a novel approach by applying the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) matrix to connect and prioritize challenges and their corresponding solutions within the context of mobile application development in the Ira-nian mobile application development ecosystem.The study reveals three primary challenges: "insufficient government financial support," "lack of knowledge in manage-ment and deficient management skills," and "absence of meaningful learning from previous experiences and other MAD ecosystems in the international markets." These challenges are identified as crucial hindrances to the effective enhance-ment of the MAD ecosystem. Consequently, tailored solutions are proposed for each challenge, aiming to address and overcome these obstacles for the sustainable growth of the mobile application development landscape in Iran.
- Ahamd, A., Feng, C., Asim, S M., yousif, A. (2018). An Empirical Study of Investigating Mobile Applications Development Challenges, SPECIAL SECTION ON SOFTWARE STANDARDS AND THEIR IMPACT IN REDUCING SOFTWARE FAILURES ,6, 17711-17728.
- Ahammeda, F., Azeem A., (2013). Selection of the most appropriate package of solar home system using analytic hierarchy process model in rural areas of Bangladesh. Renew Energy. 55: pp. 5-11.
- Alsaadi, M. R., Ahmad, S. Z., & Hussain, M. (2018). A quality function deployment strategy for improving mobile-government service quality in the Gulf cooperation council countries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(8), 3276-3295.
- Apoorv P, Akanksha P , Vineet K , (2023). Mobile Application Market by Type, alliedmarketresearch, by segment report.
- Arasti, Z., Zandi, F., & Talebi, K. (2012). Exploring the effect of individual factors on business *failure in Iranian new established small businesses. International Business Research, 5(4), 2.
- Aydarov, D., Klochkov, Y., Ushanova, N., Frolova, E., & Ostapenko, M. (2018). Developing Plans for QFD Based Quality Enhancement. System Performance and Management Analytics, 241-249.
- Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: Are small firms different. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 467-487.
- Bamshad, V., talebi, k., yazdani, h., (2021). A Systematic Mapping Review and analysis of cognitive science in Opportunity Identification Literature: 1994-2018. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(1), 1-19.
- Bunj Shafiyi. (2018). International confrance on Applied Research in Management & Industrial Engineering, Investing in small midsized ventrures, Tehran, IRAN.
- Boot, A. W. (1999). European lessons on consolidation in banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2-4), 609-613.
- Chavis, L. W., Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2011). The impact of the business environment on young firm financing. The world bank economic review, 25(3), 486-507.
- Chitsazan, H., Talebi, K., & Mohebali, A. (2017). Identifying and Prioritizing the Most Common Methods of Bootstrap Financing in IT-based Start-ups. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 61-79.
- Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of business venturing, 18(6), 689-708.
- Dewey, A. & Drahota, A. (2016) Introduction to systematic reviews: online learning module Cochrane Training https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews
- Fartash, K., Baramaki, T., Saremi, M. S., & Sadabadi, A. A. (2022). The Growth Challenges of Pioneer Knowledge-based Firms of ICT. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 15(3), 41-54(in persian).
- John, R., Smith, A., Chotipanich, S. and Pitt, M. (2014), “Awareness and effectiveness of quality function deployment (QFD) in design and build projects in Nigeria”, Journal of Facilities Management, 12 (1) 72-88.
- Gutiérrez, J. A & Xu, G.(2006). An exploratory study of killer applications and critical success factors in m-commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 4(3), 63-79.
- Karimi, A., & Bozarjomehri, S. (2014). Phenomenology of experiences and entrepreneurs’ perceptions of entrepreneurship phenomenon; A qualitative study. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 7(3), 467-486.
- Nyamaka, A., Botha, A., Biljon, J,. Marais, M. (2018). Challenges Botswana’s Mobile Application Developers Encounter: Funding, Commercial and Technical Support, 2018 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa).
- Pedarpour, A., Haghighi-Rad, F., Abtahi, A.R. (2022). A QFD-TRIZ Hybrid Method for a Hygiene Product. Int.J. Sysytematic Innovation, 7(1), 18-34.
- Sadatrasoul, S. M., Asadifar, R., Shokri, H. R., (2022). Identify policy tools to develop technological collaboration of large industrial companies with knowledge-based companies, Innovation Management Journal, 80.
- Statista Research department. (2021). Mobile app revenue worldwide 2017-2025, by segment report.
- Szczepanski, Martin.(2018). European app economy, State of play, challenges and EU policy. From ERPS (European Parliamentary Research Service): http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)621894
- Vinayak, K. and Kodali, R. (2013), Benchmarking the quality function deployment models, Benchmarking: An International Journal,20(6), 825-854.
- Zheng, X. and Pulli, P. (2012), “Improving mobile services design: a QFD approach”, Computing and Informatics, 26(4),369-381
