AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Volume 9 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.202502_9(1).0006
Submit to IJOSI
Cite this article
1
Citations
1
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Knowledge management capability and innovation ambidexterity: The role of intellectual capital andintangible competitive advantage

Nirusa Sirivariskul1*
Show Less
1 Department of Management, Faculty of Management Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Surin Campus, Thailand
IJOSI 2025 , 9(1), 68–77; https://doi.org/10.6977/IJoSI.202502_9(1).0006
Submitted: 23 August 2024 | Revised: 16 November 2024 | Accepted: 19 November 2024 | Published: 19 February 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). Licensee AccScience Publishing, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
HTML
Abstract

This study examines the impact of intellectual capital enabled knowledge capability management on innovation ambidexterity and the moderating role of intangible resources advantage through the lens of open innovation. The sample consists of 105 companies in the Thai food industry. To enhance understanding of how companies can achieve success in innovation, an interesting result of the study is that it helps companies explore new knowledge and leverage existing or new knowledge to innovate more continuously. Based on the presented findings, intangible resources advantage plays a positive moderating role in this relationship: knowledge capability management and intangible resources advantage work together to foster innovation ambidexterity.

Keywords
Intangible Resources Advantage
Intellectual Capital
Innovation Ambidexterity
Knowledge Capability Management
References
  1. Abubakar, A.M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M.A. &Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decisionmaking style and organizational performance, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(2),104–114.
  2. Ahmed, S.S., Guozhu, J., Mubarik, S., Khan, M. & Khan, E. (2019). Intellectual capital and business performance: the role of dimensions of absorptive capacity, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 23–39.
  3. Allameh, S.M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858–874.
  4. Altintas, G., & Ambrosini, V. (2019). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
  5. Armstrong, S. J. & Overton, T. S.(1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail survey,Journal of Marketing Research,14, 396–420.
  6. Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  7. Carnabuci, G. & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination, Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1591–1613.
  8. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic organizational learning practices in innovation performance, European Management Review, 17(4), 835–855. 
  9. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R.(1983).A global measure of perceived stress,Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.
  10. Cuganesan, S. (2005). Intellectual capital-in-action and value creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 357–373.
  11. Del Giudice, M. and Della Peruta, M.R. (2016). The impact of IT-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: a structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 484–498.
  12. Hair, J.F Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.& Tathan, R.L.(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis,6th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  13. Hair, J.F Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J.& Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis a Global Perspective,Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 
  14. Hall, R.(1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2): 135–144.
  15. Hofer, C. & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analysis concepts, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  16. Hsu, I. C., & Sabherwal, R. (2011). From intellectual capital to firm performance: The mediating role of knowledge management capabilities, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(4), 626–634.
  17. Lei, H., Khamkhoutlavong, M. & Le, B.P. (2020). Fostering exploitative and exploratory innovation through HRM practices and knowledge management capability: the moderating effect of knowledge-centered culture, Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 1926–1946.
  18. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K.(1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences,Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets,Harward University Press, Cambridge. MA.
  19. Kaufmann, L. & Schneider, Y. (2004). Intangibles: a synthesis of current research, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 366–388.
  20. Kim, B.Y. & Oh, H. (2004). How do hotel firms obtain a competitive advantage? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 16(1), 65–71.
  21. Lee, J.Y. (2011), Incremental Innovation and Radical Innovation: The Impacts of Human, Structural, Social, and Relational Capital Elements, Operations and Sourcing Management. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University,
  22. López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J., Martın-de-Castro, ́ G., & Cruz-González, J. (2010). External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledge-intensive clusters, Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(5), 690–707.
  23. Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y. & Veiga, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in smallto medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.
  24. Machorro Ramos, F., Mercado Salgado, P., Cernas Ortiz, D.A. & Romero Ortiz, M.V. (2016). Influence of relational capital on the organizational performance of institutions of higher technological education, Innovar, 26(60), 35–50.
  25. Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P. & Carayannis, E.G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553–570.
  26. Melia, ́ M. R., P ́erez, A., B., & Dobon, ́ S. R. (2010). The influence of innovation orientation on the internationalisation of SMEs in the service sector, The Service Industries Journal, 30(5), 777–791.
  27. Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2019). Trading knowledge for status: Conceptualizing R&D alliance formation to achieve ambidexterity, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 36–42.
  28. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
  29. Nunnally, J. C.(1978). Psychometric Theory, second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  30. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability, Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
  31. Pedro, E., Leitao, J. & Alves, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and performance: taxonomy of components and multidimensional analysis axes, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 407–452.
  32. Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the growth of the firm.Oxford University Press: New York.
  33. Saunila, M. & Ukko, J. (2014). Intangible aspect of innovative capability in SMEs: Impacts of size and industry, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 32–46.
  34. Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S. & Palacios-Marques, D. (2016), E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(6),885–904.
  35. Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: A study in SMEs, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849.
  36. Taghizadeh, S.K., Karini, A., Nadarajah, G. & Nikbin, D. (2020). Knowledge management capability, environmental dynamism and innovation strategy in Malaysian firms, Management Decision, 59(6), 1386–1405.
  37. Tseng, S.M. (2016). The effect of knowledge management capability and customer knowledge gaps on corporate performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1),51–71.
  38. Tsou, H. T., & Chen, J. S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, human capital and service innovation: The case of Taiwan ICT industry, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(2), 181–203.
  39. Yang, X. (2020). Potential consequences of COVID-19 for sustainable meat consumption: the role of food safety concerns and responsibility attributions, British Food Journal, 123(2), 455–474.
  40. Youndt, M.A., Subramaniam, M. & Snell, S.A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: an examination of investments and returns, Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335–361.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept