AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.202504_9(2).0001
ARTICLE

A systematic approach to corporate innovation excellence

Koray Altun1,2*
Show Less
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, Turkey
2 ARDiMER Digital Innovation Limited, Bursa
Submitted: 19 September 2024 | Revised: 12 November 2024 | Accepted: 13 December 2024 | Published: 8 April 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). Licensee AccScience Publishing, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

While international standards on innovation management have gained interest, “excellence” in innovation management has not been thoroughly studied in the literature. To address this gap, this study proposes the “Innovation Excellence Model” for corporate innovation. This approach aims to provide a concise way of excellence in corporate innovation system design. This model focuses on three important components of the system: innovation execution system, innovation organization, and innovation engine. This model is based on three different innovation engines (idea-driven, analysis-driven, and research-driven) and proposes a card-based control system to balance workload and project flows. The integration of card-based control and its simulated case provides a tangible and effective means of translating theoretical concepts into practical execution. A novel key performance indicator, “CIP – Corporate Innovation Performance” is also introduced for monitoring the excellence degree. By fostering a holistic understanding of excellence in corporate innovation, the model enables organizations to navigate the design of innovation management system, propelling them toward excellence and growth.

Keywords
Corporate Innovation
Excellence Model
Innovation Management
References
  1. Bigwood, M.P. (2004). Managing the new technology exploitation process. Research-Technology Management, 47, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2004.11671661
  2. Dahlgaard-Park, S.M., & Dahlgaard, J.J. (2008). A strategy for building sustainable innovation excellence - A Danish study. In: K.J. Zink (Ed.), Corporate Sustainability as a Challenge for Comprehensive Management. Springer, New York, p77–94.
  3. Dahlgaard, J.J., Chen, C.K., Yang, J.Y., Banegas, L.A., & Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2013). Business excellence models: Limitations, reflections and further development. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24, 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.756745
  4. Dervitsiotis, K.N. (2010). A framework for the assessment of an organization’s innovation excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21, 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.487702
  5. Diedrichs, E., Engel, K., & Wagner, K. (2006). IMP3rove: Assessment of Current Practices in Innovation Management Consulting Approaches and Self-assessment Tools in Europe to Define the Requirements for Future Best Practices. European Innovation Management Landscape. Europe INNOVA Paper, 2. Augsburg, Germany.
  6. Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80–81, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
  7. Hyland, J., & Karlsson, M. (2021). Towards a management system standard for innovation. Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.001_0002
  8. Kimiloglu, H., & Zarali, H. (2009). What signifies success in e-CRM. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500910945011
  9. Kirchgeorg, V., Achtert, M., & Großeschmidt, H. (2010). Pathways to Innovation Excellence: Results of a Global Study by Arthur D. Little. Available from: https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/viewpoints/pathways-innovation-excellence [Last accessed on 2023 Aug 27].
  10. Land, M.J. (2009). COBACABANA (Control of balance by card-based navigation): A card-based system for job shop control. International Journal of Production Economics, 117, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.057
  11. Lee, Y., & Rim, S.C. (2016). Quantitative model for supply chain visibility: Process capability perspective. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 4049174. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4049174
  12. Lercher, H. (2020). Big Picture - The Graz Innovation Model. Available from: htps://ssrn.com/abstract=2965373
  13. Mann, R., & Grigg, N. (2004). Helping the kiwi to fly: Creating world-class organizations in New Zealand through a benchmarking initiative. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(5–6), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360410001680198
  14. Martensen, A., Dahlgaard, J., Dahlgaard, S.M., & Gronholdt, L. (2007). Measuring and diagnosing innovation excellence - simple contra advanced approaches: A Danish study. Measuring Business Excellence, 11, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040710837928
  15. Mele, C., & Colurcio, M. (2006). The evolving path of TQM: Towards business excellence and stakeholder value. International Journal of Quality & ReliabilityManagement, 23, 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610664569
  16. Mohammad, M., Mann, R., Grigg, N., & Wagner, J.P. (2011). Business excellence model: An overarching framework for managing and aligning multiple organizational improvement initiatives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22, 1213–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.624774
  17. Riezebos, J. (2006). POLCA Simulation of a Unidirectional Flow System. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Group Technology/Cellular Manufacturing. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, p332–338.
  18. Von Zedtwitz, M., Corsi, S., Søberg, P.V., & Frega, R. (2015). A typology of reverse innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12181
  19. Von Zedtwitz, M., Gassmann, O., & Boutellier, R. (2004). Organizing global R&D: Challenges and dilemmas. Journal of International Management, 10, 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2003.12.003
  20. Von Zedtwitz, M., & Joachim, M. (2020). Communication and Knowledge Flows in Transnational R&D Projects. In: Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World.Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, p227–251.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing